Buy CeraVe Moisturizing Cream. It has eighteen times the ratings, a slightly better distribution, and costs about a dollar an ounce. Buy Kiehl’s Ultra Facial Cream only if CeraVe feels too heavy on your face. Its buyers describe it as lighter, and that is most of what the extra money buys.
Kiehl’s Ultra Facial Cream is $72.00 for 4.2 fluid ounces on Amazon. CeraVe Moisturizing Cream is $17.80 for 19 ounces. Per ounce, that is roughly $17 against 94 cents. Both prices were read on 26 September 2026.
A gap that size would be easy to justify if the buyers disagreed. They don’t. CeraVe holds 4.7 stars across 148,543 ratings, with 95 per cent in the four-to-five band. Kiehl’s holds 4.7 across 8,102, with 93 per cent.
Both work, then. The useful question is what the extra $16 an ounce buys. We looked in three places: the ingredient lists, the critical reviews, and one registry neither brand’s ads bring up.
Both carry the same eczema seal
The National Eczema Association runs a Seal of Acceptance program and publishes every accepted product in a searchable directory. We searched it on 26 September 2026. CeraVe Moisturizing Cream is in it. So is Kiehl’s Ultra Facial Cream.
That matters because this comparison is usually framed as the dermatologist’s drugstore staple against the department-store splurge. On the one sensitive-skin program we could check, they sit in the same list.
The directory doesn’t publish how each product was assessed, and we found no per-product protocol. Treat the seal as a floor that both clear.
What is actually in each jar
CeraVe publishes its full ingredient list. The working parts are three ceramides (NP, AP and EOP), cholesterol, phytosphingosine and sodium hyaluronate, with petrolatum and dimethicone as occlusives. That is a barrier-repair formula built from lipids skin already uses, then sealed in.
Kiehl’s product page leads with 4.5 per cent squalane, glacial glycoprotein and what it calls pro-ceramides. We could not find the full ingredient list on the page we read, so we won’t guess at the rest. Squalane is a light, non-greasy emollient. That matches how its buyers describe the texture.
Kiehl’s also cites testing. Its page claims 72-hour hydration based on an instrumental study, and says 85 per cent of 21 subjects showed less visible redness at 24 hours. Twenty-one people is a small study. It is still more detail than CeraVe’s page gives, which says the cream is clinically tested and stops there.
The two jars side by side
Everything in this table was read from the Amazon listings on 26 September 2026.
| Product | Size | Price | Per ounce | Ratings | 5★ | 4★ | 3★ | 2★ | 1★ | 4–5 band | Seller |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CeraVe Moisturizing Cream | 19 oz | $17.80 | $0.94 | 148,543 | 85% | 10% | 3% | 0% | 2% | 95% | Amazon.com |
| Kiehl’s Ultra Facial Cream | 4.2 fl oz | $72.00 | $17.14 | 8,102 | 84% | 9% | 3% | 1% | 3% | 93% | Kiehl’s Since 1851 |
Two points of four-to-five band separate them. The price separates them by a factor of eighteen.
What the critical reviews complain about
Amazon’s star filters work when you are signed in. So on 26 September 2026 we read every critical review the one-, two- and three-star filters would serve for each jar: 39 for Kiehl’s and 40 for CeraVe, after removing duplicates and anything from Amazon’s free-product program. Then we sorted them by what they say.
Very few are about whether the cream works.
For Kiehl’s, the biggest single complaint is the jar. Fourteen of the 39 say the container looks smaller than the one they used to buy, though the label still reads 4.2 fl oz. A three-star from December 2025 is typical: “A few months ago I purchased 125 ml. And in November I purchased 125 ml again. Look at the size difference.”
Eight more say it isn’t moisturizing enough for the price, and six describe a reaction or breakouts.
For CeraVe, the biggest complaint is the seal. Nine of 40 say the tub arrived without one. One reviewer called CeraVe about it in September 2026 and “was told that no cellophane seal is on the inside of the tub”. If you expected foil under the lid, that is why there isn’t any.
Five more CeraVe critics find it too heavy. A September 2026 three-star: “The cream feels very heavy on my skin and doesn’t seem to absorb well.”
That split is the whole comparison in small. CeraVe’s critics find it too much. Kiehl’s critics find it too little for the money.